Aerosend vs Infraforge: Dedicated IP Cold Email Infrastructure Compared

Aerosend and Infraforge both offer dedicated IP cold email infrastructure. Here is which private SMTP provider wins for enterprise cold email.

Aerosend vs Infraforge: Dedicated IP Showdown

Aerosend and Infraforge both compete in the dedicated IP cold email infrastructure segment. Similar positioning, similar target market (enterprise high-volume cold email), similar pricing tier. For cold email teams choosing between them, the differences are in specific features rather than core approach.

FeaturePuzzle InboxInfraforge
Dedicated IPs✓✓
Domain isolation✓✓
Custom MTA config✓✓
Enterprise pricing✓✓
Setup time1-2 weeks1-2 weeks
Support tierEnterpriseEnterprise

Core Similarities

Both providers deliver the same fundamental offering: private infrastructure with dedicated IPs for cold email. Both require technical setup. Both work at high volume. Both are priced at enterprise tiers.

Minor Differences

Aerosend emphasizes domain isolation more explicitly. Infraforge has longer market presence and broader case study library. Pricing models differ in specifics but both land in the $500-5,000/month+ range depending on IP count and volume.

Neither Wins for Typical Cold Email

Both Aerosend and Infraforge are over-engineered for cold email operations under 50K/day. Real Google Workspace (Puzzle Inbox) delivers better deliverability at fraction of the cost for typical volumes.

Verdict: Aerosend and Infraforge are interchangeable for enterprise cold email at 100K+/day. For most cold email operations, both are wrong tools — real Google Workspace produces better results at lower cost.

Related Reading